{"id":146,"date":"2021-07-10T22:54:31","date_gmt":"2021-07-10T22:54:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/millersandiegoattorney.com\/?page_id=146"},"modified":"2021-07-10T22:56:38","modified_gmt":"2021-07-10T22:56:38","slug":"news-blog","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/millersandiegoattorney.com\/index.php\/news-blog\/","title":{"rendered":"News &#038; Blog"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[et_pb_section fb_built=&#8221;1&#8243; _builder_version=&#8221;4.9.7&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; background_image=&#8221;https:\/\/millersandiegoattorney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/law-firm-18.jpg&#8221;][et_pb_row _builder_version=&#8221;4.9.7&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221;][et_pb_column type=&#8221;4_4&#8243; _builder_version=&#8221;4.9.7&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221;][et_pb_text _builder_version=&#8221;4.9.7&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; text_font=&#8221;|700|||||||&#8221; text_font_size=&#8221;32px&#8221; hover_enabled=&#8221;0&#8243; sticky_enabled=&#8221;0&#8243;]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">News &amp; Blog<\/span><\/p>\n<p>[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=&#8221;1&#8243; _builder_version=&#8221;4.9.7&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221;][et_pb_row _builder_version=&#8221;4.9.7&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221;][et_pb_column type=&#8221;4_4&#8243; _builder_version=&#8221;4.9.7&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221;][et_pb_text _builder_version=&#8221;4.9.7&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; custom_margin=&#8221;-61px|||||&#8221; hover_enabled=&#8221;0&#8243; sticky_enabled=&#8221;0&#8243;]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Federal appeals court rules police can obtain cell tower records without a search warrant<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Matthew R. Miller Blog 07 May 2015 <br \/>Tuesday 5 May 2015<\/p>\n<p>The US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit ruled Tuesday that police may obtain historical cell phone tower location information from third-party businesses without a search warrant. Quartavius Davis was convicted for committing seven separate armed robberies between August and October 2010 in South Florida. The prosecutor presented evidence in <g class=\"gr_ gr_38 gr-alert gr_gramm gr_inline_cards gr_disable_anim_appear Grammar only-ins replaceWithoutSep\" id=\"38\" data-gr-id=\"38\">trial<\/g> of cell tower records <g class=\"gr_ gr_39 gr-alert gr_spell gr_inline_cards gr_disable_anim_appear ContextualSpelling multiReplace\" id=\"39\" data-gr-id=\"39\">form<\/g> MetroPCS during those two months, showing that cell towers connecting Davis&#8217; calls at the time of each robbery were near the locations of most of the robberies. The opinion, written by Circuit Judge Frank Hull, said there is a diminished expectation of privacy in certain records turned over to third parties, including cell tower locations because a reasonable caller knows that his cell phone will send signals to nearby towers and voluntarily conveys this information to third parties. The court deemed this to be a voluntary action because phones do not transmit cell tower signals continuously but do so only when the user decides to make a call. Obtaining the company&#8217;s records did not violate his rights against a warrantless search because the defendant never owned or controlled the information; it was exclusively in MetroPCS&#8217;s possession. The court also found that disclosure of cell tower records serves a compelling government interest in apprehending criminals.<\/p>\n<p>There has been much legal debate regarding cell phone searches. A judge for the 2nd Judicial District of Virginia ruled in November that police can force criminal suspects to unlock their cell phones with a fingerprint scanner to allow officers to open and search them, but that officers may not compel suspects to give up their phone <g class=\"gr_ gr_30 gr-alert gr_spell gr_inline_cards gr_disable_anim_appear ContextualSpelling ins-del multiReplace\" id=\"30\" data-gr-id=\"30\">pass codes<\/g>. Last June the US Supreme Court ruled <g class=\"gr_ gr_36 gr-alert gr_gramm gr_inline_cards gr_disable_anim_appear Grammar multiReplace\" id=\"36\" data-gr-id=\"36\">that police officers<\/g> must obtain a warrant before searching a person&#8217;s cell phone data, even at the time of <g class=\"gr_ gr_35 gr-alert gr_gramm gr_inline_cards gr_disable_anim_appear Grammar only-ins replaceWithoutSep\" id=\"35\" data-gr-id=\"35\">arrest<\/g>. The court also held that while the police may not search the cell phone data, they may search the cell phone itself to make sure it cannot be used as a weapon.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[et_pb_section fb_built=&#8221;1&#8243; _builder_version=&#8221;4.9.7&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; background_image=&#8221;https:\/\/millersandiegoattorney.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/law-firm-18.jpg&#8221;][et_pb_row _builder_version=&#8221;4.9.7&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221;][et_pb_column type=&#8221;4_4&#8243; _builder_version=&#8221;4.9.7&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221;][et_pb_text _builder_version=&#8221;4.9.7&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; text_font=&#8221;|700|||||||&#8221; text_font_size=&#8221;32px&#8221; hover_enabled=&#8221;0&#8243; sticky_enabled=&#8221;0&#8243;] News &amp; Blog [\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=&#8221;1&#8243; _builder_version=&#8221;4.9.7&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221;][et_pb_row _builder_version=&#8221;4.9.7&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221;][et_pb_column type=&#8221;4_4&#8243; _builder_version=&#8221;4.9.7&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221;][et_pb_text _builder_version=&#8221;4.9.7&#8243; _module_preset=&#8221;default&#8221; custom_margin=&#8221;-61px|||||&#8221; hover_enabled=&#8221;0&#8243; sticky_enabled=&#8221;0&#8243;] Federal appeals court rules police can obtain cell tower records without a search warrant Matthew R. Miller Blog 07 May 2015 Tuesday [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-146","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/millersandiegoattorney.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/146","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/millersandiegoattorney.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/millersandiegoattorney.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/millersandiegoattorney.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/millersandiegoattorney.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=146"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/millersandiegoattorney.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/146\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":150,"href":"https:\/\/millersandiegoattorney.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/146\/revisions\/150"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/millersandiegoattorney.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=146"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}